
So it was
that I joined Netflix last night. That’s right: I have absconded from Love Film
– abandoning it in favour of the younger, sexier model. Receiving DVDs through
the post no longer really suits my viewing habits and Love Film Instant is
pretty shoddy so why not branch out? That said, the first three films I
searched for weren’t on Netflix either, although they are on Love Film on DVD –
maybe I will once more return to the fold, truly repentant and admitting my
error in judgement. I may then reap the rewards of Only God Forgives, Mud, and
The Impostor... one disk at a time.
Anyway,
whilst excitedly looking through the recommendations from Netflix and after
some repeated “No Netflix – I definitely don’t want to watch Beverly Hills Chihuahua !”
I realised that many of recommendations were either crap (various saccharine
American chic-flicks), or gay/lesbian films. That’ll be the influence of
Mysterious Skin sinking in then. Hopefully the recommendations will sort
themselves out in time but they’ve only got one month to impress me before I
decide whether or not to pay for the service. The clock is ticking.
This gay/lesbian
influence is only likely to increase however after watching The Fish Child (El
Niño Pez) – the tale of Lala, a rich teenage girl in Buenos Aires who is in love with her (female)
housemaid. This should have everything I enjoy in a film – strong female
characters, foreign language, and a bit of sexual violence thrown in (no, I
don’t know what’s wrong with me). It also has a bit of zipping about through
time as the film is mostly told through flashbacks, showing the relationship
between the two women develop as they plan for the future – running away to a fantasy
house by a lake in Paraguay.
Whilst a
definite story is there, and a good one too (there’s murder and mystery, one which we’re fed pieces
of gradually through the film) it’s a story that’s really quite hard to follow.
There aren’t many physical clues for us to gauge the timing of each individual
scene, and I don’t think I’m wrong when I say that the flashbacks aren’t
strictly in chronological order. The characters’ motivations seem to swing
between extremes too and not completely believably.
Overall,
it was nice (if nice is the right word about any of the films I watch), but I
just didn’t get it. Even the title was only explained in a hurried way at the
end. Perhaps that was supposed to be a climax – it wasn’t very climactic. The
legend of ‘The Fish Child’ barely seemed to be relevant at all, although it was
referred to sporadically. My main opinion seems to “that’s a shame, it could
have been so good”.
No comments:
Post a Comment